The report was a result of a resolution passed by the Human Rights Council in March 2016 that called for a database detailing the companies engaged in a list of specified activities that directly enabled, supported or profited from Israeli settlements. Those activities included supplying construction machinery or materials, surveillance equipment and security services, as well as providing banking and financial services.
The 16-page report released Wednesday did not produce what critics of the initiative had feared would be a blacklist naming and shaming companies doing business with the settlements, but it still drew condemnation from the Trump administration and Israeli diplomats in New York and Geneva, who cited the report as proof of the Human Rights Council’s institutional bias.
President Trump’s United Nations ambassador, Nikki R. Haley, who has vowed to combat what she has described as antipathy toward Israel in parts of the organization, strongly condemned the human rights office’s report.
“This whole issue is outside the bounds of the High Commissioner for Human Rights office’s mandate and is a waste of time and resources,” she said in a statement. “While we note that they wisely refrained from listing individual companies, the fact that the report was issued at all is yet another reminder of the Council’s anti-Israel obsession. The more the Human Rights Council does this, the less effective it becomes as an advocate against the world’s human rights abusers.”
Newsletter Sign Up
Thank you for subscribing.
An error has occurred. Please try again later.
You are already subscribed to this email.
Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, denounced the report as “a shameful act which will serve as a stain on the U.N.H.R.C. forever.”
“We will continue to act with our allies and use all the means at our disposal to stop the publication of this disgraceful blacklist,” Mr. Danon added.
The human rights office was supposed to produce its report a year ago, but it said it delayed publication because of the complexity of the issues and a shortage of resources for conducting its research.
It said it planned to name the companies identified as engaged in the listed activities when it had contacted all 206 on its list but because of resource constraints it had so far made contact with only 64 of them, raising the possibility of long delays in concluding its work.
The report is to be taken up at the next session of the Human Rights Council in March when members will have an opportunity to recommend additional funding for the effort but leaving the future of the initiative uncertain if they do not.
Still, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful pro-Israel lobby in the United States, expressed concern that the action could provide a basis for further boycotts and legal action against companies doing business with Israel.
To counter that risk, it urged Congress to pass the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, which was introduced in the House and Senate early last year and would expand existing American anti-boycott laws.