Kenyans Name a ‘People’s President,’ and TV Broadcasts Are Cut

He added that the government would release a statement “when the time is right.”

At the time their transmissions were interrupted, the private broadcasters Citizen TV, KTN and NTV were showing people sitting peacefully in Uhuru Park in Nairobi. The stations continued to stream footage online, albeit with some interruptions, showing a growing but peaceful crowd.

Mr. Kenyatta summoned the owners of several media outlets to a meeting on Friday at the State House, the official residence of the president, and warned them against broadcasting any ceremony for Mr. Odinga.

Kenyans Name a ‘People’s President,’ and TV Broadcasts Are Cut
Kenyans Name a ‘People’s President,’ and TV Broadcasts Are Cut

Mr. Kaikai, the editors guild chairman, issued a statement denouncing the meeting, which he called a “brazen threat” that was “ intended to intimidate the media from performing its rightful role of informing the public on matters affecting them.”

Hanningtone Gaya, chairman of the Media Owners Association of Kenya, attended the meeting on Friday, describing it as a “dressing down” at which media owners were “read the riot act,” according to Mr. Kaikai’s statement.

It is unclear what, specifically, prompted the government to dismantle the stations’ broadcasting equipment Tuesday morning.


Mr. Odinga in Nairobi in November. He lost his presidential bid last year to Uhuru Kenyatta, but says the voting was plagued by fraud.Credit Thomas Mukoya/Reuters

“As far as I know, that has got absolutely no precedent,” said John Githongo, a longtime civil rights advocate, former government official and publisher of the nonpartisan political magazine The Elephant.

Mr. Githongo cited a government ban on live broadcasts during post-election violence in 2008, out of fear that bloodshed on television could incite further violence. Though live news broadcasts of the violence were banned, stations continued to transmit programming.

“I am not certain there is any precedent for this since the advent of multiparty politics in 1991,” Mr. Githongo said.

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

Thank you for subscribing.

An error has occurred. Please try again later.

You are already subscribed to this email.

View all New York Times newsletters.

  • See Sample
  • Manage Email Preferences
  • Not you?
  • Privacy Policy
  • Opt out or contact us anytime

In November, the government considered imposing restrictions on news outlets after television stations broadcast a six-hour standoff between Mr. Odinga’s supporters and the police. Viewers watched as supporters of the opposition marched across Nairobi pursued by police officers who fired water cannons and tear gas and, according to witnesses and medical workers, live bullets. (The police have denied using live gunfire.)

At that time, Mr. Njoka had told The New York Times that the broadcasts could be considered incitement to violence, and that the government was weighing whether to further restrict coverage of opposition demonstrations. But no moves against the news media were made until Tuesday.

By 3 p.m. Tuesday, Mr. Odinga had taken an “oath” as the “people’s president” and had given a short speech denouncing Kenya’s “electoral autocracy” and “election stealing.” The park emptied immediately after he spoke.

David Aduda, a veteran Kenyan journalist, said the government’s move to interrupt private broadcasts had “exploded” tensions that have been building between the media and the government for months. Local journalists have complained privately that the government began interfering with coverage last year, as the political campaign season kicked off, but few wanted to go on the record about political interference in their work.

“There’s no doubt any more that the government is out to cripple the media,” Mr. Aduda said. “Previously, you would hear of anecdotal evidence here and there, but there was no concrete evidence. Now, here we have it.”

“There is no justification for this,” he added, speaking of the broadcast disconnections. “This shows that we have a very intolerant government that does not respect media freedom, and for that reason, the media have every reason to keep fighting for every space to be able to operate according to the law.”

While Mr. Njoka, of the Interior Ministry, suggested that the television blackout was meant to maintain calm, Mr. Githongo of The Elephant said it could have the opposite effect.

“I’m getting calls from my relatives up country, who obviously know this is happening, and they’re getting bits from social media and telephone calls talking about mayhem in Nairobi, about a police crackdown — things that are not happening,” Mr. Githongo said.

“That’s what happens” with a blackout, he said. “The quality of the information goes down.”

Follow Jina Moore on Twitter: @itsjina.

Continue reading the main story

Similar Posts