Liam Fox has accused peers of trying to “thwart the will of the British people” after they voted to give Parliament a potentially decisive say over Brexit.
The International Trade Secretary said such a move could lead to the UK being in the EU “indefinitely”.
The vote would give MPs the power to stop the UK from leaving the EU without a deal or make Theresa May return to the negotiating table.
The government does not have to do what the House of Lords says.
An amendment to the EU Withdrawal Bill giving MPs the power to stop the UK from leaving without a deal, or to make Theresa May return to negotiations, was approved by 335 votes to 244 on Monday night in the House of Lords.
Its supporters said Parliament, not ministers, must “determine the future of the country”.
Labour said the vote marked a “hugely significant moment” in the fight to ensure Parliament has a “proper role” in the Brexit negotiations and a no-deal situation was avoided.
The government will now try to persuade MPs to strike out the change.
It was one of three government defeats on the Brexit bill on Monday evening.
- Government defeated on Brexit deal vote
- Brexit: All you need to know
- A guide to the EU Withdrawal Bill
- UK will leave customs union, insists No 10
Mr Fox, a leading voice in the 2016 campaign to get Britain out of the EU, said: “The public voted in the referendum, they voted to leave the European Union, the House of Commons passed the legislation to allow that to happen.
“It is not acceptable for an unelected house to try to block the democratic will of the British people.
“So we will be leaving the European Union, we will be leaving the single market and we will be leaving the customs union.”
He said allowing Parliament to send the prime minister back to Brussels if MPs and peers did not like the deal the government had secured with the EU opened up the possibility of “delaying exit from the EU indefinitely”.
And the option of “leaving the EU without an agreement” had to be kept on the table.
He said there was a “big debate” to be had about whether an “unelected House” could “thwart the view of the British electorate”.
Analysis by the BBC’s Alex Forsyth
So far, the government has framed Parliament’s vote on a final Brexit deal as a stark choice; take it or leave it.
The implication – if MPs reject whatever terms are negotiated – the UK would leave the EU without a deal on future relations.
But this amendment agreed by the House of Lords could prevent that, by giving Parliament the power to decide what happens if MPs turn down the final agreement.
The result will embolden those pushing for a greater role for Parliament in the process.
The bill will return to the Commons before anything is finalised – and with some Tory peers again proving their readiness to defy their party vote with the opposition, the question is how many Conservative MPs are prepared to do the same.
And he categorically ruled out the UK being in a some of form of customs union with the EU after Brexit, amid speculation the government could be lining up a “customs partnership” or an EU association deal.
“No, I don’t think we can stay in the customs union for a number of reasons, the main reason being that we would be in a worse position than we are today,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“If we were in a customs union with the European Union we would have to accept what the EU negotiated in terms of market access to the UK without the UK having a voice.”
He added: “I don’t think there is a customs union that could ever be acceptable.”
Please upgrade your browser
Your guide to Brexit jargon
The UK is due to leave the European Union on 29 March 2019, with plans for a transition phase until the new permanent relationship kicks in after 31 December 2020.
Both sides hope to negotiate the UK’s withdrawal agreement by this October in order to give the UK and European Parliaments enough time to debate and vote on it before the moment of departure.
The amendment proposed by Conservative Viscount Hailsham would allow Parliament to determine the government’s course of action if MPs rejected the deal or if the UK and EU were not able to reach an agreement of any kind.
It would also give Parliament control of the process if the legislation enshrining the withdrawal treaty promised by ministers was not approved by 29 March 2019.
The peer, who as Douglas Hogg was an MP for many years, told the House of Lords the principle of parliamentary sovereignty was “fundamental to our liberties and must not be betrayed” when it came to Brexit.
“Whatever our party affiliation, our duty as parliamentarians is to our country and our conscience,” he said.
But former Conservative leader Lord Howard said the idea of effectively giving Parliament a veto over Brexit “reveals the appalling lengths to which the die-hard Remainers are prepared to go to achieve their aims”.